by Roger Yeoman
•
2 January 2021
Jack Albert Lintern, hairdresser. Rectory Cottage, Ditcheat, was charged at the instigation of William Tylcr, of the Investigation Branch G.P.0., London, with obtaining £4/9/9 by means of forged instrument, a falsely date stamped betting letter, on 5th September. 1929. at; Ditcheat. There was a second charge against him for endeavouring to obtain £5/8/1 by means of a forged instrument falsely date stamped lettering letter. 27th September, 1929, at Ditcheat, and a third in regard to a similar offence at Ditcheat on 29th September, 1929, when the amount attempted to be obtained was £l2/9/6. In respect to the last case similar summons was issued against Frederick Ward, labourer. 6, Prospect Villas, Ditcheat. Mr. F. W. Willmott, solicitor, of Taunton, appeared to prosecute on behalf of the Postmaster General, and Mr. W. F. Long, of Bath, was with the defendant. By the consent of all parties the cases were taken together. In outlining the cases at length, Mr. Willmott said the method adopted by Lintern was to get 'envelopes stamped with the letter “A”, which indicated that the letter had been posted before 10 o’clock in the morning. He was enabled to do this through the instrumentality of a young lady named Miss Turner. Having secured these envelopes Lintern inserted in them betting slips containing the names of winning horses of races won later in the day, having previously ascertained the results through being acquainted With Mr. Spencer White, of Shepton Mallet, who gave them him over his own telephone. The receipt of some of these letters marked “A” led to suspicions being raised in London by the recipients. The matter was reported to the Post-master General, and inquiries instituted. In so far Miss Turner was concerned he could only say that she had been imposed upon by Lintern, by reason of some tale had told her. She had received no financial gain by participating in the frauds, but had rather courted severe disciplinary action. Continuing, Mr, Willmott characterised the betting slips sent by Ward to Mr. White a particularly impudent affront. They very seldom were able to got evidence so clear as in those cases, and was instructed to put the matter forward very strongly so far as Lintem was concerned. Mr. Long stated that they did not dispute any of these statements made by Mr. Willmott. George Sleigh, a representative of Alec Ward, commission agent, 11a, Bridge-Street, Bristol, stated that on the 6th September he received a betting letter from London, This contained a 1 - each way on Miss Lynn, and 2/6 double bet on Miss Lynn and Golden Hair. Both these horses won at Derby on September 5th. The starting prices were 8 to 1 against and 11 to 4 against respectively. The amount won with a stake of 4/6 was £4/9 /9, which money was paid. On September 6th his suspicions wore aroused by the date stamp, and he had made enquiries and found that the letter “A” stamped on the letter proved that it had been posted before ten o’clock. Joseph Middleton, representative of A. H. Maurice, Ltd., commission agents. Bridge-lane, London, said he received bets of 2/6 each way Gaffadoun, any to come 10/- win on Money Talks. Gaffadoun won at Newbury and Money Talks at Newmarket, the starting price being 25 to 1 Gaffdoun, and 3 to 1 against Money Talks. With a stake of 5/- the winnings would have been £5/8/1, and if the bets had been genuine that amount would have been paid. He was suspicious about the date stamps, and handed the letter to the Post Office for enquiries. Told to Get Out. Walter Spencer White, commission agent, of the Bungalow, Shepton Mallet, said that before 27th September he had had dealings with the man Lintern, who was in the habit of placing a few bets and ’phoning up for results of the races, which witness used to give him. He gave himresults on 5th September and 27th September. On 28th September received a letter with the Ditcheat A mark, which contained a betting slip in name of F. Ward, Prospect House, Ditcheat, with 2/6 each way on Gaffadoun, any to come 10/- win on Money Talks. If the bet had been genuine. Ward would have been paid £l2/9 /6. On the 4th of October Ward came to him and said., “I want my winnings on Gaffadoun and Money Talks.” I asked him if the betting slip was in his handwriting, and said “Yes.” Witness said “Are you quite certain.” and again replied “ Yes.” Witness then told him he could clear out. He had reason to think that the handwriting was the same the letters received from Lintern. Cross-examined by Mr. Long, he said that previous to this he had never had any betting transactions with Ward. John Bertram Sissons, of the Secretary’s Office G.P.0., London, said he asked defendant the bets were made after the winning horses were known, and replied Not all of them”. As regards the letter of the 5th September to Mr. Ward, he said got the names of the winners from Mr. White by telephone, and then wrote out slips. He got the young lady in the Post Office to put A stamp on it. Defendant made similar admissions with regard to other letters of 22nd September to Mr. Maurice, and 27th September to Mr. White. Pleaded Guilty. Defendants were then formally charged and both elected to be dealt with summary and pleaded guilty. Mr Long said defendants had admittedly done a fraudulent act. but that the frauds would never have been but for the foolishness of a third person. The young lady at the Post Office was the cause of the trouble. If she had not done what she did the temptation would never have arisen. That, however was no excuse. . Mr. Alfred J. Barber, of Abbey Farm, Ditcheat gave evidence of character, and letters testifying to their good character were read from the Head Teacher of the Ditcheat School and Mr. Talbot of Castle Cary (Lintem’s former employer). £10 in Fines. The Chairman, addressing Lintern, said they had found him guilty of a serious offence, and had no other alternative but to convict. Unfortunately betting seemed to have hold of large class of people, and led to serious temptations. In view of his age they had decided not to send him to gaol, but to fine him £5 in first case. £3 in the second, and £2 in the third. A further would £5 would be allowed for costs. With regard to Ward, they thought he had been influenced by Lintern, but was the older the two and ought to have resisted the temptation. They did not feel compelled to convict in this case and bound him over in a sum of £10 for two years, with one surety of £5.—His employer, Mr. Barber, agreed stand as surety.